- Related articles:
- What Are Lipids and What Do They Do?
- Easy Biology Class
- Post navigation
- Lipids - Structure Of Lipids - Structure Of Fats - Triglycerides, Phospholipids, Prostaglandins
- Lipids: Definitions, Classification and Nomenclature
- Fats and lipids pdf file
- What are Lipids?
- Lipids Definition
- Contact Form
Although most of us who work with these fascinating molecules have our own understanding of what is meant by the term " lipid ", there is no agreement in the lipid community over the definition. The following comments represent my personal view therefore.
The historical origins of the term make interesting reading, and should assist with a definition . Thus, Bloor  in classified lipoids into three groups, simple lipoids fats and waxes , compound lipoids phospholipoids and glycolipoids and derived lipoids fatty acids, alcohols and sterols. This classification appeals to me and appears to have been accepted until the s. Only later and rather arbitrarily were compounds such as carotenoids, terpenes, steroidal hormones and now polyketides included in the term.
What Are Lipids and What Do They Do?
General text books tend to describe lipids in woolly terms as a group of naturally occurring compounds, which have in common a ready solubility in such organic solvents as hydrocarbons, chloroform, benzene, ethers and alcohols.
They comprise a diverse range of compounds that can encompass fatty acids and their derivatives, carotenoids, terpenes, steroids and bile acids. It should be apparent that many of these compounds have little by way of structure to relate them, although they may have certain functions in common.
In fact, a definition of this kind is positively misleading, since many of the substances that are now widely regarded as lipids, for example gangliosides and bile acid conjugates, may be as soluble in water as in organic solvents. Unfortunately, this definition persists in the scientific literature and respected text books .
Easy Biology Class
Such indeterminate descriptions are understandable when it is recognized that there is no definition of a lipid that has been accepted by any international body that recommends standards or comments on nomenclature issues. Where others fear to tread, I put forward my own preferred definition in , and I recommend it until something better is proposed.
It is -. Lipids are fatty acids and their derivatives, and substances related biosynthetically or functionally to these compounds. This encompasses all the compounds we consider to be the mainstream of lipids, together with those hydrophobic compounds that function in membranes, e.
A further useful guide to lipid classification, structures and nomenclature is a paper by Fahy and colleagues , which is available from the Journal of Lipid Research as a free download here I applaud their attempt to define the term 'lipid', though their definition still seems too broad to me, i.
Lipids are hydrophobic or amphipathic small molecules that may originate entirely or in part by carbanion-based condensations of thioesters fatty acids, polyketides, etc. This definition may make sense to a biochemist, but what are physical chemists, food scientists and so forth to make of it? For example, non-biochemists may find it difficult to reconcile most polyketides with their view of the more traditional lipids. It has even been argued that this definition appears to suggest that almost any organic compound not a carbohydrate, protein or nucleic acid is a lipid.
Lipids - Structure Of Lipids - Structure Of Fats - Triglycerides, Phospholipids, Prostaglandins
While this may be a perfectly valid view-point, it would make my task as a chronicler of lipid science much more difficult. I expressed a number of reservations when this paper was first published and subsequently directly to the authors and indirectly via my blogs, mainly because the document seemed to be heavily weighted towards animal lipids, while many unique and important plant lipids had been overlooked.
Lipids: Definitions, Classification and Nomenclature
This fault was largely remedied in a second publication , where the authors generously admitted their earlier bias and introduce new sub-classifications to encompass the plant glycosyldiacylglycerols including a key lipid in photosynthesis - sulfoquinovosyldiacylglycerols although lower in their hierarchy than the glycerophospholipids. Sterols are now categorized according to their chemical structures rather than to their biological origins. That said, my own preference would be to elevate more of the sub-classes to a higher level for functional reasons.
For example, the glycosyldiacylglycerols have similar physical properties and functions in plant membranes as the glycerophospholipids, and they should be classified in the same rank.
Fats and lipids pdf file
I would have three analogous classes for sphingolipids, with perhaps a fourth for gangliosides, as to be consistent, phospho-sphingolipids and glyco-sphingolipids should be treated separately by analogy with the glycerolipid classifications. Another group in a classification limbo are the phosphoglycolipids as defined here. The general aims of the two papers are admirable, and hopefully what I consider the faults will be cured in time by dialogue.
I would also argue that a subdivision of glycerolipids into two broad classes according to polarity or complexity is so convenient for analysts, biochemists and physical chemists that it should be given greater weight in any practical classification system, i. In practice, it is often necessary to subdivide the main groups further. For example, the complex lipids for many purposes are best considered in terms of either the glycerophospholipids or simply as phospholipids , which contain a polar phosphorus moiety and a glycerol backbone, or the glycolipids, which contain a polar carbohydrate moiety.
What are Lipids?
For practical reasons, sphingolipids are often analysed separately from the glycerolipids and they are usually treated by chemists and biochemists alike as a distinct group. It can also be convenient to think in terms of storage lipids , e. Abbreviations: I have never been a fan of abbreviations; they are useful for authors but a nuisance for readers.
If they must be used, it is better to decide on ones that are likely to become standards. Fahy et al.
The subjects of lipid nomenclature and classification are dealt with at many points in this website, but especially in relation to individual lipid classes as listed here.
For definitive detailed accounts, we can serve you best by pointing to the following documents, which are all available in the form of PDF files as free downloads from the journals specified below.
The nomenclature of lipids. Lipid Res. Lipids , 2, Download kb. The nomenclature of lipids Recommendations Lipids , 21 , or Hoppe-Seyler's Z.
Nomenclature of glycolipids. Recommendations However, I have found discrepancies between the published and website versions for the former, especially in the shorthand nomenclature for fatty acids; the print versions are correct and definitive. It is - Lipids are fatty acids and their derivatives, and substances related biosynthetically or functionally to these compounds.
Nomenclature The subjects of lipid nomenclature and classification are dealt with at many points in this website, but especially in relation to individual lipid classes as listed here.
References Gidez, L. The lore of lipids. Bloor, W. Outline of a classification of the lipids.
Gurr, M. Lipids: Biochemistry, Biotechnology and Health 6th Edition.
Wiley-Blackwell Christie, W. Fahy, E. A comprehensive classification system for lipids.
Lipid Sci. Lipid Analysis 1 st edition Pergamon Press, Oxford Christie Author: William W.